APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 5 OF LIMITATION ACTON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN RE-FILLING THE PRESENT RESTORATION APPLICATION

IN THE --------------- COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

I.A NO.       OF 2015

IN

------------. _______ OF 2015

IN THE MATTER OF:-

ABC.                                                                    …      Applicant

VERSUS

Xyz                                                                       …      Respondent

APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 5 OF LIMITATION ACTON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN RE-FILLING THE PRESENT RESTORATION APPLICATION.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:-

1 . That the petitioner has filed accompanying application for restoration of objection petition. That all the facts have been stated in the restoration application and may be treated as part and parcel of

the present application and the same is not reproduced for the sake of brevity.

2. That the present restoration application has been filed on ----------- before this Hon'ble Court. The application for restoration came under objections on -----------. The said application was collected from registry.

3. . That while dismissing the present objection petition in default and non-prosecution because of non-appearance on behalf of the petitioner, the Hon’ ble High Court that no application for restoration would be entertained unless cost of Rs.5,000/- are first paid. The counsel for petitioner informed the department for preparation of cheque of Rs.5,000/-. The concerned department at delhi, processed the file for the said cheque. After due approval and sanction, the cheque was finally prepared on ----------- .. The cheque having no. ----------- of Rs.5,000/- was sent from delhi and handed over ·to the counsel on -----------. The said cheque of Rs.5,000/- was handed

over to the respondent counsel on -----------. The  Hon I ble High Court was closed for winter vacation on -----------. Thereafter the present restoration application was re-filed on -----------after reopening of Hon’ ble Court. In the process delay has occurred in refilling the present restoration application. The copy of letter &

photocopy of cheque are annexed as ANNEXURE--- (COLLY).

4. That the delay in refilling is not willful or international rather circumstantial.

PRAYER

In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon' ble Court may be graciously be pleased to:-

I. condone the delay of 85 days, in refilling the present application for restoration of the objection petition.

II. Pass such other and further order as this Hon' ble  Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and  circumstances of the case.

PETITIONER/ APPLICANT

THROUGH                                                 

Advocate

NEW DELHI

DATE:

APPLICATION UNDER ORDER 9 RULE 4 OF CPC, APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF SUIT OR PETITION

IN THE --------------- COURT OF --------- AT .........

I.A NO.       OF 20--

IN

------------. _______ OF 20--

IN THE MATTER OF:-

ABC.                                                                    …      Applicant

VERSUS

Xyz                                                                       …      Respondent

APPLICATION UNDER ORDER 9 RULE 4 OF CPC, READ WITH SECTION 151 OF CPC, ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER, FOR RESTORATION OF PRESENT OBJECTION PETITION. WITH AFFIDAVIT.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

1.       That the aforesaid matter was pending adjudication in the regular list before this Hon’ ble High Court. The matter in regular list reached for final hearing on --.--. Again the matter came up for

hearing on -------- and this Hon’ ble High Court pleased to dismiss the present objection petition in default and non-prosecution because of nonappearance on behalf of the petitioner.

          The copy of the order-dated ------- is annexed as ANNEXURE-A.

2.       That the petitioner counsel couldn't notice the present case published and circulated in the cause list on -------- and -------. Hence couldn't appear on the above dates. The office staffs of petitioner counsel was instructed to regularly checkup the matters in regular matters on internet but they failed and missed out previous listing of the matters on -------- & ------. Since counsel of petitioner was not aware of above listing. Hence couldn't appear in the matter before this Hon' ble High Court at the time of hearings on above mentioned dates. The petitioner-department was also not aware about the  listing of the present case on above-mentioned dates.

3.       That on -------------------, the counsel for petitioner Mr --------------- Adv received a message from the office of Mr --------------- that the present matter has been - dismissed in default and non-prosecution for non appearance. Thereafter, the office of counsel for petitioner checked up the previous orders and came to know about the orders dated --------------------- and -------------. Thereafter the restoration application was  prepared and sent for signature to the department, on ---------------------. The signed copy of restoration application received by the counsel on --------- and hence the application is being filed before this Hon' ble Court.

4.       That the absence of counsel for petitioner was not wilful or intentional rather circumstantial.

5.       That in the above facts and circumstance of the  case and in the interest of justice and the Hon' ble High Court may be pleased to restore the present objection petition.

PRAYER

It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to:-

           a.        Allow the present restoration application andrestore the present Objection                             Misc. Petition OMP No.000/0000 to its original position .

b.         Pass such other or further orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case.     

PETITIONER/ APPLICANT

THROUGH                                                 

Advocate

NEW DELHI

DATE:

ORDER 1 RULE 3 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE

“Order I Rule 3 CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE 

Who may be joined as defendants.-All persons may be joined in one suit as defendants where-

(a) any right to relief in respect of, or arising out of, the same act or transaction or series of acts or 

transactions is alleged to exist against such persons, whether jointly, severally or in the alternative;

and

(b) if separate suits were brought against such persons, any common question of law or fact would arise.

Order II Rule 3 CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE 

Joinder of causes of action.-(1) Save as otherwise provided, a plaintiff may unite in the same suit 

several causes of action against the same defendant, or the same defendants jointly; and any plaintiffs

 having causes of action in which they are jointly interested against the same defendant or the same 

defendants jointly may unite such causes of action in the same suit.

(2) Where causes of action are united, the jurisdiction of the Courts as regards the suit shall depend 

on the amount or value of the aggregate subject matters at the date of instituting the suit.”

Civil Procedure Code 1908