Monday, January 18, 2016

APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 5 OF LIMITATION ACTON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN RE-FILLING THE PRESENT RESTORATION APPLICATION

IN THE --------------- COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

I.A NO.       OF 2015
IN

------------. _______ OF 2015


IN THE MATTER OF:-

ABC.                                                                          Applicant

VERSUS

Xyz                                                                       …      Respondent

APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 5 OF LIMITATION ACTON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN RE-FILLING THE PRESENT RESTORATION APPLICATION.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:-

1 . That the petitioner has filed accompanying application for restoration of objection petition. That all the facts have been stated in the restoration application and may be treated as part and parcel of
the present application and the same is not reproduced for the sake of brevity.
2. That the present restoration application has been filed on ----------- before this Hon'ble Court. The application for restoration came under objections on -----------. The said application was collected from registry.
3. . That while dismissing the present objection petition in default and non-prosecution because of non-appearance on behalf of the petitioner, the Hon’ ble High Court that no application for restoration would be entertained unless cost of Rs.5,000/- are first paid. The counsel for petitioner informed the department for preparation of cheque of Rs.5,000/-. The concerned department at delhi, processed the file for the said cheque. After due approval and sanction, the cheque was finally prepared on ----------- .. The cheque having no. ----------- of Rs.5,000/- was sent from delhi and handed over ·to the counsel on -----------. The said cheque of Rs.5,000/- was handed
over to the respondent counsel on -----------. The  Hon I ble High Court was closed for winter vacation on -----------. Thereafter the present restoration application was re-filed on -----------after reopening of Hon’ ble Court. In the process delay has occurred in refilling the present restoration application. The copy of letter &
photocopy of cheque are annexed as ANNEXURE--- (COLLY).
4. That the delay in refilling is not willful or international rather circumstantial.
PRAYER
In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon' ble Court may be graciously be pleased to:-
I. condone the delay of 85 days, in refilling the present application for restoration of the objection petition.

II. Pass such other and further order as this Hon' ble  Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and  circumstances of the case.

PETITIONER/ APPLICANT


THROUGH                                                 
Advocate

NEW DELHI
DATE: