Monday, November 30, 2015

I What is brain-mapping. and how does it work?

I What is brain-mapping. and how does it work?



        American scientist Lawrence Farwell is credited with developing brain mapping or brain fingerprinting technology. This system determines whether or not specific information is stored in a person’s memory. The test measures individual brain-wave responses to relevant words, pictures or sounds presented by a computer. Our brain has the capacity to store events as memories. This function of the brain is used in differentiating a criminal and an innocent person. The criminal’s brain stores the sequence of events that happens at the crime scene, an innocent man’s brain however would have no such memories. The brain fingerprinting method scientifically detects the presence or absence of specific information. Words, pictures, codes and sounds related to the crime are presented to the subject by a computer.




Amendment of Section 37 of the arbitration and conciliation act 1996

20. In section 37 of the principal Act, in sub—section (1 ), for clauses (a) and (b), the following clauses shall be

substituted, namely:—

“(a) refusing to refer the parties to arbitration under section 8;

(b) granting or refusing to grant any measure under section 9;

(c) setting aside or refusing to set aside an arbitral award under section 34.”.

What is narco-analysis?

What is Narco-analysis?



       The Latin expression “in vino veri- tas” meaning "truth in wine” shows that alcohol can be the one of the oldest truth sera. The term narco-analysis is derived from the Greek word narke meaning “numbness “ and is used as a psycho therapeutic as well
as an interrogating technique that uses barbiturate drugs or truth serums  to induce a State of unconsciousness in which secrets come to the surface; Where they can be exploited by the therapist. In modern times, sodium thiopental or sodium pentothal is Widely used as a truth serum. This drug decreases higher cortical brain functioning. The main principle Which works in this analysis is the hypothesis that lying is more complex than truth and hence a lower level of cortical activity Will force the subject to tell the truth.

PETITION UNDER SECTION 11(6) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 FOR APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATOR

IN THE -------- AT NEW DELHI

ARBITRATION PETITION NO. _______ OF 2015

IN THE MATTER OF:-
ABC                                                                      …      Applicant
Versus
Xyz                      
                                                …      Respondent

PETITION UNDER SECTION 11(6) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 FOR APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATOR

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHEWETH:

1.
Provision under Section which the Application is filed.





Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as “the said Act”).
2.
Name of the Applicant with complete address.




ABC
3.
Name of the other party to the Arbitration Agreement with complete address.







Xyx

4.
Names and addresses of the Arbitrators, if any, already appointed by the parties.





None
5.
Name and address of the person or institution, if any, to whom any function has been entrusted by the parties to the Arbitration Agreement under the appointment procedure agreed upon by them.












In accordance with Clause 34 of the terms and conditions agreed upon between the parties, disputes may be referred to Arbitration of a person selected by the Applicant out of a panel of three persons nominated by the General Manager of the Unit or Project of the Respondent Company to which the Contract relates.
6.
Qualification required, if any, of the Arbitrator by the agreement of the parties.






None





7.       The brief facts describing the general nature of the disputes and the points at issue.


“34.0 Arbitration and Governing Law
34.1   Arbitration:
All disputes and differences which may arise out of or in connection with or are incidental to the Agreement(s) including any dispute or difference regarding the interpretation of the terms and conditions of any clause
.”



A.           same is realized.


B.           That in terms of Clause 34 of the general purchase conditions of the said Purchase Order, it was agreed that in case of any disputes that may arise pertaining to the agreement, the Applicant shall be entitled to select an arbitrator from a panel of 3 persons nominated by the Respondent. However, in spite of serving upon the Respondent the notice invoking arbitration, no reply has been received by the Applicant.

C.           Accordingly, the Applicant has no other option and is constrained to file the present Petition before this Hon’ble Court for appointment of Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate all disputes between parties.

D.          The Respondent has its Office at New Delhi, within the territorial jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. Detailed discussions, negotiations and meetings have taken place between the applicant and the respondent at -----, both before and after execution of the said agreement.  The arbitration proceedings between the parties have further been stipulated to be held at ---- as per the agreement between the parties. Hence, it is submitted that this Hon’ble Court has the territorial as well as pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain, try and dispose of the present Petition, since the cause of action and/or part thereof has arisen within the territorial jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court.

E.           That the present application is filed within the period of limitation.
8.
Valuation of the subject matter.





That the present suit has been valued at Rs.-------/-and appropriate Court fees is being affixed on this petition.
.
Reliefs.

In the premise, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to:-

(a)      Appoint a sole Arbitrator to adjudicate upon and decide all the disputes between the Applicant and the Respondent arising out of or relating to Purchase Order No. -------; and

(b)      Pass such further orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.




APPLICANT
THROUGH                                       
-
ADVOCATES FOR THE APPLICANT
-
-
DATED:     /  /2015



VERIFICATION:
I, , designated as ------ of the applicant do hereby verify that what is stated in paragraphs 1 to ___________) is based on the information received from the records of the Applicant company and what is stated in the remaining paragraph is based on legal advise and I believe the same to be true.

Verified on this       day of,            , 2015.

DEPONENT
                                                        



IN THE- COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

ARBITRATION PETITION NO. _______ OF 2015


IN THE MATTER OF:-

-.                          ---                                                  Applicant

VERSUS

-----              …      -------------------------------Respondent

AFFIDAVIT
I, - S/o of Shri -, aged about --years, presently -  of the Applicant company having its registered office at-, India, do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under:-

1.       That I am -   in the Applicant Company and am duly authorized and competent to sign and verify the present Petition and am fully conversant with the facts and circumstances of the case and am competent to swear the present affidavit.
                              
2.       That I have gone through the contents of the accompanying Application under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which has been drafted by the Counsel at my instance and I state that the same are based on the official records maintained by the applicant Company and are believed to be true and correct.

3.       That the contents of the present affidavit are true and correct and nothing material has been concealed.

DEPONENT
VERIFICATION

Verified at New Delhi on this _____ day of ________ 2015 by the above named deponent that the contents of the above affidavit are true and correct, no part of it is false and nothing material has been concealed therefrom.
DEPONENT

URGENT APPLICATION for List the Case in the Court

IN THE ----- COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

------NO. _______ OF 2015

IN THE MATTER OF:-

Abc                                                                                 . …    APPLICANT

VERSUS

M/S.Xys                                                                 …   RESPONDENT


URGENT APPLICATION

1.  May I request you to kindly treat the for accompanying application/Suit Writ Petition/ CM Main Petition/any an urgent one in accordance with the Rule of the High Court of Delhi.


     2.    Urgent direction are prayed for.


3.           Kindly list on.--/----/2015





-
                             ADVOCATES FOR THE PETITIONER 
                                      -


DATED: ---/----/2015
NEW DELHI