Wednesday, September 23, 2015

Relationship between MOA and AOA.

ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION :
Ø  These are internal regulations of the Company.
Ø  Play a subsidiary part of MOA.
Ø  Define duties, rights and powers of governing body as between themselves and Company at large and mode and form of business of Company to be carried on.
Ø  It is optional for a public Company limited by shares to register articles and compulsory for other types of Company

Relationship between MOA and AOA.
¨       Articles subsidiary to memorandum- Articles accept memorandum as charter of incorporation – Ashbury Railway carriage case
¨       MOA and AOA be read together but terms of MOA cannot be modified or controlled by articles- Mudialliar’s Case – Articles cannot extend the scope of MOA ; Birla investments vs CCI- Articles cannot supersede the objects of MOA.
¨       Alteration of articles is subject to express or implied prohibition by MOA- Andrews v. Gas Motor Co.

Contents of Articles:
1.       Different classes of shares and their rights.
2.       Forfeiture of shares and their re issue.
3.       Transfer and transmission of shares
4.       Alteration of share capitals
5.       Payment of under writing commission of shares and debentures
6.       Re organization of share capital
7.       Appointment, power, duties and remuneration of MD, director, manager or secretary and auditors
8.       General meetings and board meetings
9.       Winding up

Alteration of articles- By special resolution cannot be negatived by contract
Limitation on Alteration: Alteration of pointers should be
§  Not inconsistent with Company Act or any other law in force
§  Not inconsistent with condition of MOA
§  Not inconsistent with order of CLB to remedy, oppression and mismanagement.
§  Bonafide for benefits of Company as a whole
§  Not constitute a fraud on minority.
§  Cannot justify a breach of contract
PROMOTERS: Meaning: It is a person who undertakes to form a Co. with reference to a given project and takes necessary steps to accomplish that purpose.  In other words a promoter means a person
o   Originates the scheme for formation of Company
o   Prepares , executes and registers MOA and AOA
o   Finds the first directors
o   Settles the terms of preliminary contracts and prospectus
o   Advertises and circulates the prospectus, placing the capital
Duties of promoters:
¨       To act as a fiduciary agent-  To act in good faith towards Company (Erlanger case)
¨       To disclose to Company his position, profit and interest in property which is the subject of sale and purchase by the Company.
¨       Not to make any profit out of the promotion of Co. without disclosing it to the Co.

Liability of promoters:
Ø  Rescission of contract by Company in case of breach of trust provided agreement not ratified after finding out non disclosure of misrepresentation or recovery of secret profits.
Ø  If rescission not possible, Company entitled to claim damages against promoters
Ø  Promoters also liable to damages for fraud if party to a willful false statements.
Ø  In case of winding up promoter liable for misfeasance or breach of trust.

Pre- Incorporation Contracts:
Contracts which the promoters enter into for the Company before incorporation are called pre-incorporation contracts.
Legal Position
English law
·         A Company cannot enter into a contract before its incorporation because it does not exist at that time as a legal person
·         The Company cannot even ratify such contracts although it can enter into a fresh contracts after its incorporation.

Indian position :
¨       Pre incorporation contracts not legally binding upon the Company as before incorporation, Company is a non entity.
¨       Company also not entitled to sue on a pre incorporation contract
¨       S. 19 (e) of specific relief Act 1963 provides that specific performance may be enforced against a Company where the promoters have entered into a contract for the purposes of Company and contract warranted by the terms of its incorporation. Example: by inclusion in the AOA
The expression warranted by the terms of incorporation means within the scope of Company objects as stated in the MOA.
The term for the purposes of Company means such contracts are necessary for incorporation and working of Company eg: printing of MOA articles
¨       Section 19(h) of the specific relief Act provides that specific performance of such contract may be enforced by the Company provided contract accepted and such acceptance communicated to other party to contract.

Case Law: Erlanger Vs New Som Lrero Phosphate Company ( All ER).
Erlanger a paris banker with one other person purchased an island containing phosphate mines for 55,000. They formed a company to purchase a lease of island and work the mines.

Erlanger named five directors of which two were abroad and remaining three were under complete control of Erlanger. These three directors purchases island for company for 10,000. A prospectus stating that contract for purchase of island entered into was issued .

At the ordinary GM, objection was raised about the purchase , matter investigated and truth was revealed. The company failed and promoter was sued for refund of profit made.

The Court observed promoter is not prevented from selling his own property to Company but must sell through the medium of BOD who can do exercise and intelligent judgment on the transaction.

Promoters of Company stand undoubtedly in a fiduciary position. if the company on coming into existence purchases property of promoters , it is incumbent upon the promoters to take care that in forming company they provided with BOD to decide whether purchase ought or ought not to be made.

DOCTRINE OF ULTRA VIRES

DOCTRINE OF ULTRA VIRES :
 A Company cannot go beyond the powers expressly or impliedly conferred by statute or MOA. Moving away from the that field invites ‘Doctrine of Ultra Vires’. Ultra means beyond and vires means power.
·         An act done outside the MOA is beyond the power of Company that is ultra vires.
·         Where the Act is ultra vires the directors, share holder can ratify it.
·         Where the Act is ultra vires the Company it is void and cannot be ratified by any such majority of share holders.
·         The powers in MOA not become independent objects by themselves. They effectuate the objects of the Company .
·         Main objects = Rule of construction : it has been held that a Co. does not have implied power
      (i)             To use funds for political purposes
    (ii)            To give gifts and make donations or contributions for charities not related to objects in memorandum
   (iii)            To sell or dispose off whole Company undertaking
  (iv)            To enter into contracts of surety or guarantee etc
    (v)            To give loans to Company not engaged in financing or banking

Case Law:
1)            Ashbury Railway carriage vs Riche (House of Lords)

The apparent Company was formed with the objects of carrying on business as mechanical engineer and general contractors. The Company entered into a contract with Richie for financing the construction of a railway of Belgium.

An Action was brought by Richie against for damages of breach of contract. The House of Lords observed that the term General contractors must be taken to indicate such contracts as are connected with the business of mechanical engineers. It does not authorize making of contracts of any or every description held the contract entered into by the Company for financing the construction of railway was ultra vires, hence null and void. An ultra vires contract, being void ab initio , cannot become intra vires by estoppel, lapse of time , ratification , acquisance or delay.

2)            In Re John beauforte

The Company authorize by its MOA to carry on business of costumes, gown, robe , dress and other activities of allied nature, entered into some contract in order to carry out a business of venered panels, admittedly ultra vires the objects of Company held contracts of ultra vires and Company was not liable for any claims arising out of such contracts.

In India, the doctrine of ultra vires was applied by Bombay high Court in Jahangir Modi vs. S Lodha and reaffirmed by the SC in A Laxamana Swami Mudalliar Vs LIC.

3)            A Laxamana Swami Mudalliar Vs LIC:  In this case the directors of Company were authorized to make payment towards any charitable or benevolent object or any general or useful object.
In accordance with the share holders resolution the directors paid Rs 2 lacs to a trust form for promoting technical or business knowledge.  Subsequently business was taken over by LIC. LIC asked for refund. The SC observed where the primary object of Company was to carry on life insurance business, the donations of charitable purposes could not be set to be incidental to or naturally conducive to that object. An Act is incidental if it has ’reasonably proximate connections with the objects.’ Power to do a thing and object of Company are two different things.  By conferring power object clause cannot be extended. The articles may explain the memorandum but cannot extend its scope.  The Court also laid down that an office bearer of a Company responsible for passing a resolution which is ultra vires the Company will be personally liable to make good the amount belonging to the Company.
Held Payment was ultra vires the Company.  They could spend the money for the promotion of such charitable objects as would be useful for the attainment of companies own objects and not for any other objects.
Effect of ultra vires transactions:
1.                   Injunction
2.                   Personal liability of directors (Jahangir Modi’s Case)
3.                   Ultra vires acquired property – Property transferred to a Company by formal transfer or  conveyance is in law duly vested in such Company, Even though Company not empowered to aquire such property. This is so because property represents money of the Company.
4.                   Ultra vires contracts- null and void – even though dealing with the Company under the impression that Act is intra vires.
5.                   Ultra vires lending- Money lend by Company not authorized to lend, Company can sue to recover it.
6.                   Ultra vires tort – Company not liable for torts committed by its employees unless committed in the courts of intra vires activities and their employment.



  • CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS
  • Political Contributions :
  • DIVIDEND
  • BORROWING POWER OF COMPANY  DEBENTURE AND CHARGE
  • Allotment of shares
  • LAW OF PROSPECTUS IN COMPANY LAW 
  • Relationship between MOA and AOA.
  • DOCTRINE OF ULTRA VIRES
  • CONVERSION OF PRIVATE Company TO PUBLIC Company
  • KINDS OR TYPES OF COMPANIES
  • COMPANY LAW:-Characteristics of Company

  • CONVERSION OF PRIVATE Company TO PUBLIC Company

    CONVERSION OF PRIVATE Company TO PUBLIC Company
    1) BY Default S. 43  Automatic conversion of a private Company into public Company takes place by operation of law in case of default in complying with statutory requirements of section 3(i)(iii). However Central Govt. on being satisfied that failure to comply with conditions was accidental, or due to inadvertence or due to other sufficient cause, may on application order that Company be relieved from such consequences.
    2) By Choice S. 44 If a private Company alters, by special resolutions its Articles constituting private Company, it shall on the date of alteration cease to be a private Company.
    A prospectus or a statement in lieu of prospectus be filed with the registrar within 30 days after such alteration. Other requirements of public Company be also complied with. After conversion, the word private would be deleted from the name of the Company.
    3) By operation of law S. 43A this section has been made inoperative except subsection 2A by Companies (Amendment) Act, 2000. The effect of the amendment is that a private Company will not automatically become a public Company on account of turnover or shareholding.
    CONVERSION OF Public Company TO Private Company S.31
    A public Company may by special resolution alter its articles so as to include the requirements of a private Company as mentioned in S. 3(i)(iii) an approval of Central Govt. is obtained.
    10) Producer Company  Part IX A dealing with producer Company inserted by Companies Act 2002
    It focuses on multi state Company-operative societies to bring them in the mainstream economic activity without giving up the cooperative principle of mutual assistance. It provides for incorporation cooperative societies as Companies and gives the option of conversion of existing cooperatives into Companies.  Features :
    ·         Offers a statutory and regulatory framework to compete with other enterprises on competitive footing.
    ·         Provides for incorporation of producer Companies on mutual assistance and cooperative principles basis with liberal regulatory framework and modifications.
    ·         Shares may be transferred with the approval of BOD, no takeover targets by MNCs
    ·         Conversion of cooperative society to producer Company is voluntary
    ·         Conversion possible only if 2/3rd members vote in favor of resolution to that effect.
    ·         Members of producer Company have to be primary producers.
    ·         Objects of producer Company, inter alia, include production, manufacture and sale of primary as well as allied produce.

    10) Company regulated by Special Acts  S. 616
    ·         Banking Companies  governed by Banking Companies Regulation Act, 1949
    ·         Insurance Companies   governed by Insurance Act, 1938
    ·         Cos. engaged in generation and supply of electricity governed by Indian Electricity Act, 1910.


    REGISTRATION OF COMPANY S. 33

    Application with the following documents be presented to the Registrar of state in which registered office of Company as stated by the memorandum to be situate-
                        I.            Memorandum of Company
                      II.            Articles
                    III.            The agreement, if any, Company proposes to enter with any individual for appointment as its managing or whole time director or manager
                    IV.            A deceleration to the effect that all the requirements of Companies Act and rules made thereunder complied with such deceleration be made by any of the following :
    ·         An advocate of Sc or HC or
    ·         An attorney or pleader entitled to appear before HC , or
    ·         A secretary or a CA in whole time practice in India engaged in forming a Company
    ·         A person named in articles as Director, manager or secretary of the Company
    Effect of registration/ Certificate of Incorporation 
    1)      The registrar shall state, on registration of memorandum certify under its hand, that the Co. is incorporated. The Co. comes into existence from the date of certificate of incorporation.
    2)      From the date of incorporation mentioned in the certificate of incorporation, subscribers and members of Company shall be a body corporate by the name contained in memorandum, having perpetual succession and a common seal.
    Conclusiveness of certificate of incorporation S. 35
    Certificate of incorporation shall be conclusive evidence that all the requirements of the Act have been complied with in respect of registration and association is a Company authorized to registered and duly registered under the Act.
    Thus, certificate of incorporation once issued can’t be challenged except in case of alleged illegal objects. Remedy would be to wind up the Company.

    MEMORANDUM OF ASSOCIATION

    S. 2(28) memorandum means MOA of a Company originally framed or altered from time to time in pursuance of provisions of Company law or this Act.
    ·         It sets out the constitution of the Company
    ·         It is charter of the Company
    ·         It defines the relation of the Company with the outsider and scope of its activities
    ·         It contains the fundamental conditions for incorporation.
    S. 16= A Co. shall not alter the conditions in MOA except in cases and in manner and to the extent provided in the Act.
    S. 15= MOA shall be
    ·         Printed
    ·         Divided into paras numbered consecutively
    ·         Signed by each subscriber with address, description and occupation in the presence of at least one witness attesting the signature.
    Changes in MOA
    1.            Name Clause
    ·         A Company must have a name
    ·         A Company cannot be registered with a name which in the opinion of Central govt. is undesirable or identical with nearly resembling name of another registered Company.
    ·         The last word of the name must be ‘Ltd’ in case of limited Company with limited liability and ‘Private Limited ‘in case of Private Company.
    ·         The central govt. may by license grant exemption from S. 13(1)(a) after being satisfied that object of co0 is promotion of commerce , art, science, religion, charity etc.
    ·         Name and address of Company must be painted or affixed outside of entry place of business in a conspicuous position in letters easily legible and in prescribed language.
    ·         Name must be mentioned in all business letters and other official publication, on all negotiable instruments issued or endorsed by the Company.

    ALTERATION
    ·         By special resolution with the approval of the central govt. signified in writing.
    ·         No such approval required if change is addition thereto/ deletion there from of the word ‘Private’ consequent on the conversion of a public Company to a private Company.
    ·         The application for change of name may be made by a registered proprietor of a trade mark, if in the opinion of the central govt., the name is identical with or nearly resembles a regd. TM of such proprietor under TM Act, 1999.
    ·         Case Law: Kothari Products Ltd. Vs ROC (All HC). The appellant Company was marketing edible items under the regd. TM ‘Parag’. One ‘Parag Intl.’ was registered without the consent of the appellant. Held:  name held to be undesirable and court ordered change thereof.
    2.            Registered Office Clause
    ·         This is necessary for fixing the domicile of the Company.
    ·         The domicile is the place of registration and Residence is the place of management and control.
    ·         A Company must have, from the date of commencement of business or within 30 days of incorporation, whichever is earlier, a registered office to which all communication and notice must be addressed.
    ALTERATION
    (1) Change within the same state
                    (i) Change within one city, town or village: By passing a special resolution to that effect.
                    (ii) change  from one city, town or village: By special resolution, notice to registrar within 30 days.

    (2) Change from one state to another:  
    ·         Requires alteration of MOA of Company.
    ·         By special resolution filed with the Registrar within 30 days.
    ·         With the approval of the central govt.
    ·         If any creditor objects to the alteration, either his consent must be obtained or his debt must be satisfied.
    ·         Certified copy of the central govt’s confirmation order with altered MOA be filed within 3 months thereof with the Registrar of Companies of both the states.
    ·         Certificate of registration of transfer from registrar of both the states to be obtained.
    ·         Notice of new registered office be given to the Registrar of state to which office shifted within 309 days after the change.

    Case Law:  In Re Mackinnan Mackerzie & Company.  1967 (Cal HC)
    The Company having registered office at Calcutta passed a resolution at its GM that registered office of the Company will be situated within the state of Maharashtra and applied to the Court for confirmation of change of registered office. The state opposed to it.
    Held:  the expression ‘public’ used in section 17 includes creditors and shareholders only and not the state, unless it stands in the capacity of the creditor. ‘the state has no locus standi’ and has no statutory right to intervene in application under section 17 of Company’s act.
    The Court further held that UOI was to be considered as an entity and it would be unfair and partial to speak of loss of revenue to any particular State, because in ultimate analysis, loss to one State would be gain to another State and loss would be neutralized by gain.
    The Court overruled the decision of Orissa HC in orient paper mills case and concluded that Petitioner Company was entitled to success.

    Case Law: Minerva Mills V/s State of Maharashtra 1975 (Bom HC)
    The Company having registered office at Bombay passed a special resolution in its GM that registered office of Company would be situated in the State of Mysore. Company’s mills were already in Mysore and that shifting would be helpful in carrying on its activities economically and efficiently.

    The Company filed a petition for confirmation of the Court. The Court observed that where strong ground exists for sanctioning the transfer of registered office from one State to another, the mere fact that some of the shareholders may be different from the shareholders who passed the resolution cannot be a ground for refusing the confirmation of alteration of MOA.

    The State cannot assume to itself the role of a guardian of shareholders’’ interest or interfere with the management of the Company. The vague considerations of impact of transfer on general economy of the State are no ground for rejecting the confirmation of the transfer of registered office.  The Court confirmed the transfer of registered office of Company but subject to condition that Company furnishes to the State a bank guarantee of the amount claimed as arrears of sales tax by the State.
    3.            Object Clause
    The most important clause.  The objects for which the proposed Co. is to be established r stated. Divided in sub clauses
    (1)          Main objects: Main objects and objects incidental or ancillary to the main objects.
    (2)          Other objects: objects not included in the above clause.
    (3)          States to whom the objects extend: in case objects not confined to one State
    Purpose of object clause
    ·         Protects investors of Company by making known the objects of the Company
    ·         Ensures the investor that their money not risked in another adventure
    ·         Protects creditors by ensuring that the Company’s funds not dissipated in unauthorized activities,
    ·         Serves publi8c interest by preventing diversification of Company’s activities not closely connected with the interests of the Company
    ·         Prevents concentration of economic power.

    ALTERATION
    Substantive limits Section S. 17(1)
    By special resolution to enable it –
    a.      To carry on its activities more economically and efficiently or
    Case Law: Straw products Vs ROC. (Orissa HC) Company was allowed to make alterations in its MOA to enable it to make contributions to political parties.
    b.      To attain its main purpose by new improved means, or
    c.       To enlarge or change local area of its o0peration or
    d.      To carry on some business conveniently/ advantageously combined with the Company.
    The expression some business may include new business not destructive or inconsistent with existing business.
    Case Law:  In Re United Collieries (Cal HC) when the business of a Company is nationalized and can no longer be carried on it can be allowed to alter its MOA to venture into entirely new field.
    e.       To restrict or abandon any of the objects in MOA
    f.        Case Law:  In re Mafatlal Consultancy Services (CLB) Held : A Company cannot shift objects from other objects to main objects.
    g.      To sell or dispose of the whole or any part of undertaking
    h.      To amalgamate with any other Company.

    Such special resolution to be filed with the ROC within one month from the date thereof.
    4.            Liability Clause
    Company limited by shares: Liability = nominal value of shares held or amount of unpaid capital. Of shares fully paid up, NILL
    Company limited by guarantee:  Liability = amount undertaken to contribute to the assets of the Company in the event of winding up.
    ALTERATION  : liability cannot be increased unless members consent in writing, whether before or after the alteration.
    5.            Capital Clause
     Company with share capital = amount of share capital, division of capital into shares of a fixed amount.
    ALTERATION :  if articles authorize, a Company limited by shares by ordinary resolution passed in GM to
                                                          i.            Increase/ decrease the authorized share capital
                                                        ii.            Consolidate or sub divide shares.
                                                       iii.            Convert stock into shares and vice versa
                                                      iv.            Cancel the shares not taken or agreed to be taken.
    6.            Subscription Clause
          (i)            Declaration that persons subscribing with signature to MOA desirous of forming an association
        (ii)            Each subscriber must sign in presence of at least one witness, attesting the signatures.